Citations (6)


Footnotes (292)



Patenting Speech

Dan L. Burk

University of California, Irvine School of Law


Texas Law Review, Vol. 79, 2000

Recent court cases regarding the regulation of computer software have held that such code may be protected expression under the First Amendment. Some courts have drawn on the law of copyright to conclude that because copyright protects expression, and software is copyrightable, that software must contain protected expression. But because of the recent expansion of patent doctrine to encompass software and other digital communications, it appears that such "speech" will also be patentable. Patent law is even more poorly equipped than copyright to distinguish function from expression. The paper reviews the likely problems inherent in applying patent law to expressive subject matter, and suggests the doctrinal changes that may be required to accommodate First Amendment interests in patentable speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: software, patents, First Amendment, speech, expression, communication, fair use, copyright, encryption

JEL Classification: K1, K3, O31, O32, O33, O34, L86

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 25, 2000 ; Last revised: October 3, 2015

Suggested Citation

Burk, Dan L., Patenting Speech (2000). Texas Law Review, Vol. 79, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=223517 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.223517

Contact Information

Dan L. Burk (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
4500 Berkeley Place
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-9325 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,316
Downloads: 316
Download Rank: 63,491
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  292

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds