Do Agents Game Their Agents' Behavior? Evidence from Sales Managers
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - Carlson School of Management; Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
March 19, 2013
This paper explores intermediary agency problems, specifically the use and misuse of authority and incentives in organizational hierarchies. Through a principal-supervisor-agent model inspired by sales settings, I propose organizations delegate authority over salespeople to frontline sales mangers because they can decompose performance measures into ability and luck. The model yields the result that managers on the cusp of a quota have a unique personal incentive to retain and adjust quotas for poor performing subordinates, permitting me to isolate an interest of a manager from the firm. I parametrically estimate the model using detailed microdata from 244 firms that subscribe to a "cloud"-based service for processing sales and compensation. I estimate 13-15% of quota adjustments and retentions among poor performers are explained by the managers' unique personal interest in meeting a quota. I use agency theory to discuss how firms mitigate the cost of gaming.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: Agency Theory, Gaming, Incentives, Sales, Compensation
JEL Classification: J33, D22, L21, M51, M52working papers series
Date posted: March 20, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds