Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2236570
 


 



Comparative Institutional Competency and Sovereignty in Indian Affairs


Michalyn Steele


Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

March 20, 2013

85 University of Colorado Law Review 759-816 (2014)

Abstract:     
While vigorous debate surrounds the proper scope and ambit of inherent tribal authority, there remains a critical antecedent question: whether Congress or the courts are ultimately best situated to define the contours of inherent tribal authority. In February 2013, Congress enacted controversial tribal jurisdiction provisions as part of the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization recognizing and affirming inherent tribal authority to prosecute all persons, including non-Indian offenders, for crimes of domestic violence in Indian country. This assertion by Congress of its authority to set the bounds of tribal inherent authority -- beyond where the United States Supreme Court has held tribal inherent authority to reach -- underscores the importance of addressing the question of which branch ought to resolve the issue.

This Article proposes a framework drawn from Supreme Court jurisprudence in the field of state sovereignty to argue that when sensitive issues of sovereignty are at stake, the comparative competence of the respective branches must be considered. Unlike any preceding work in this field, this Article proposes a model based on the indicia of institutional competence to suggest that Congress, rather than the courts, is the branch best suited to determine the scope of inherent tribal sovereignty.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Tribal sovereignty, American Indian law, Native American law, Violence Against Women Act, domestic violence, criminal law, tribal civil authority, Oliphant, Garcia, Lara, state sovereignty

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2013 ; Last revised: May 8, 2014

Suggested Citation

Steele, Michalyn, Comparative Institutional Competency and Sovereignty in Indian Affairs (March 20, 2013). 85 University of Colorado Law Review 759-816 (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2236570 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236570

Contact Information

Michalyn Steele (Contact Author)
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States
8014223239 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 565
Downloads: 74
Download Rank: 188,413

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds