The Future of the Law of Armed Conflict: Ostriches, Butterflies, and Nanobots
Eric Talbot Jensen
Brigham Young University School of Law
35 Michigan Journal of International Law 253 (2014)
The law has consistently lagged behind technological developments. This is particularly true in armed conflict, where the 1907 Hague Conventions and the 1949 Geneva Conventions form the basis for regulating emerging technologies in the 21st century. However, the law of armed conflict, or LOAC, serves an important signaling function to states about the development of new weapons. As advancing technology opens the possibility of not only new developments in weapons, but also new genres of weapons, nations will look to the LOAC for guidance on how to manage these new technological advances.
Because many of these technologies are in the very early stages of development or conception, the international community is at a point in time where we can see into the future of armed conflict and discern some obvious points where future technologies and developments are going to stress the current LOAC. While the current LOAC will be sufficient to regulate the majority of future conflicts, we must respond to these discernible issues by anticipating how to evolve the LOAC in an effort to bring these future weapons under control of the law, rather than have them used with devastating effect before the lagging law can react.
This paper analyzes potential future advances in weapons and tactics and highlights the LOAC principles that will struggle to apply as currently understood. The paper will then suggest potential evolutions of the LOAC to ensure it continuing efficacy in future armed conflicts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 66
Keywords: law of armed conflict, law of war, armed conflict, future, international humanitarian law, robots, nanotechnology, weapons, drones, technology, cyber, directed energy, biological agents, genomics, attack, distinction, proportionality, means and methods, autonomous, private military companies, hacker
JEL Classification: K10, K33, N40, O33
Date posted: March 24, 2013 ; Last revised: June 9, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds