Citations (1)


Footnotes (260)



Social Hierarchies and the Formation of Customary Property Law in Pre-Industrial China and England

Taisu Zhang

Duke University - School of Law; Yale University


American Journal of Comparative Law, Forthcoming

The appendices for this paper are available at the following URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239843

Comparative lawyers and economists have often assumed that traditional Chinese laws and customs reinforced the economic and political dominance of elites and, therefore, were unusually “despotic” towards the poor. Such assumptions are highly questionable: Quite the opposite, one of the most striking characteristics of Qing and Republican property institutions is that they often gave significantly greater economic protection to the poorer segments of society than comparable institutions in early modern England. In particular, Chinese property customs afforded much stronger powers of redemption to landowners who had pawned their land. In both societies, land-pawning occurred far more frequently among poorer households than richer ones, but Chinese customary law allowed debtors to indefinitely retain redemption rights over collateralized property, whereas English debtors would generally lose the property permanently if they failed to redeem within one year.

This article argues that the comparatively “egalitarian” tendencies of Qing and Republican property institutions stemmed from the different ways Chinese and English rural communities allocated social status and rank. Hierarchical “Confucian” kinship networks dominated social and economic life in most Chinese villages. Within these networks, an individual’s status and rank depended, in large part, on his age and generational seniority, rather than personal wealth. This allowed many low-income households to enjoy status and rank quite disproportionate to their wealth. In comparison, substantial landed wealth was generally a prerequisite for high status in early modern England, effectively excluding lower-income households from positions of sociopolitical authority. Chinese smallholders possessed, therefore, significantly more social bargaining power, and were more capable of negotiating desirable property institutions. Paradoxically, the predominance of kinship hierarchies actually enhanced macro-level political and economic equality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Kinship, Hierarchy, Social Status, Social Norms, Custom, Mortgages, Dian, Confucianism

JEL Classification: K11, N45, P52, Q15

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2013 ; Last revised: December 30, 2014

Suggested Citation

Zhang, Taisu, Social Hierarchies and the Formation of Customary Property Law in Pre-Industrial China and England (2013). American Journal of Comparative Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2238430

Contact Information

Taisu Zhang (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Yale University ( email )
New Haven, CT 06520
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,570
Downloads: 412
Download Rank: 46,253
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  260

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds