Shame: A Different Criminal Law Proposal for Bullies

Xiyin Tang

Yale Law School

March 25, 2013

Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2013

Public concern over bullying has reached an all-time high. The absence of a sensible criminal charging and sentencing regime for the problem recently reared its head in the highly-publicized prosecution of Dharun Ravi, who was convicted of 15 counts and faced the possibility of 10 years in prison. This Essay argues that existing criminal statutes used to address the problem, like bias intimidation and invasion of privacy, do not fit neatly with the specific wrongs of bullying. However, recently-enacted “cyberbullying” laws, which give complete discretion to school administrators, are weak and ineffective. I propose another solution: first, to criminalize the act of bullying itself, thus sending a powerful expressive message that can flip the high school and teenage norm of meanness as virtue. To reinforce that message, sentencing a bully to shaming, not imprisonment, better serves utilitarian, expressive, rehabilitative, and retributive goals specific to the wrongs of bullying.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: bullying, retribution, expressive law, cyberbullying, charging, sentencing, rehabilitation

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 26, 2013 ; Last revised: June 6, 2014

Suggested Citation

Tang, Xiyin, Shame: A Different Criminal Law Proposal for Bullies (March 25, 2013). Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239312

Contact Information

Xiyin Tang (Contact Author)
Yale Law School ( email )
127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 654
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 228,292

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds