Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239978
 
 

Footnotes (22)



 


 



Race Matters


Larry Alexander


University of San Diego School of Law

Maimon Schwarzschild


University of San Diego School of Law

April 2013

Constitutional Commentary, 2014, Forthcoming
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 13-109

Abstract:     
One frequently hears that America has a race problem. We agree, but the race problem we identify is not what is usually meant by those who invoke it. It is not discrimination, intentional or otherwise, but rather obsession with race that is America’s more consequential “race problem” today. America has vanquished slavery, segregation, and long-standing racial discrimination only to succumb to an almost equally destructive race obsession. Despite the biological arbitrariness of dividing a single, interbreeding biological species into “races,” despite the sorry history legally and socially of the use of race, and despite the civil rights movement’s original ambition to substitute the content of character for the color of skin as the basis of decision making, America today is in many ways as race conscious as it was in the era of Jim Crow.

For that reason we welcome David Boonin’s Should Race Matter? Boonin takes up five topics that constitute a good portion of the current obsession — reparations, affirmative action, hate speech, hate crimes, and profiling — and he subjects each to philosophical scrutiny. Boonin is sober and fair minded in tone, and purports to be careful and comprehensive in method. Unlike many discussions of race, Boonin’s tries to shed light, not heat. He deserves to be read by everyone who takes a serious interest in public policy as it bears on race.

Boonin’s book has its limitations, as we will suggest. Moreover, Boonin discusses only race, not sex, ethnicity, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual preference, although most of the policies he considers have been urged or actually extended beyond race to some or all of these other categories. Nonetheless, Boonin’s analyses of these policies as they bear on race would have direct implications for these other categories. Given that Boonin takes 350 pages to examine five racial policies, we think limiting his focus to race was quite justifiable.

Although we believe Boonin’s is a worthwhile treatment of contemporary racial policies, we take issue with him on several points. We think that his arguments in support of affirmative action and hate crimes are incomplete and thus unpersuasive, and we consider his case for reparations a failure on its own terms. Nonetheless, we admire the effort at fair-mindedness and the care with which he makes the case for these policies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: affirmative action, reparations, profiling, hate speech, hate crimes, discrimination

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Alexander, Larry and Schwarzschild, Maimon, Race Matters (April 2013). Constitutional Commentary, 2014, Forthcoming; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 13-109. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2239978

Contact Information

Lawrence Alexander (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-2317 (Phone)
619-260-4728 (Fax)
Maimon Schwarzschild
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-2343 (Phone)
619-260-4791 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 483
Downloads: 111
Download Rank: 150,140
Footnotes:  22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds