Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2240350
 
 

Footnotes (217)



 


 



False Negatives under a Discount Attribution Test for Bundled Discounts


Bradley Pollina


New York University School of Law

March 27, 2013

22 CommLaw Conspectus - Journal of Communications Law and Policy 74 (2014)

Abstract:     
Consumers love to pay less and get more. But are better deals at the retail point of sale always welfare-enhancing? This question points to the puzzle of bundling and bundled discounts. The antitrust concerns raised by a recent set of agreements in the telecommunications sector, allowing for the sale of a four part "quad play" bundle, provide a good opportunity to re-examine contemporary bundling analysis under the antitrust laws. There are several reasons to conclude that the four-part bundle set to be sold by Verizon Wireless, in partnership with several cable companies, will have anticompetitive effects. The purpose of this paper is to point out the ways in which the quad play could be used as an exclusionary device while still passing muster under the Ninth Circuit's discount attribution test, which requires a showing of below cost pricing when the full amount of discounts given on the bundle are allocated to the product facing competition.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: antitrust, bundling, mixed bundling, quad play, telecommunications, Verizon, discount attribution, below cost pricing, wireless, mobile, telephone, Ninth Circuit, Third Circuit, Lepage's, Cascade, Brooke Group

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 30, 2013 ; Last revised: April 19, 2014

Suggested Citation

Pollina, Bradley, False Negatives under a Discount Attribution Test for Bundled Discounts (March 27, 2013). 22 CommLaw Conspectus - Journal of Communications Law and Policy 74 (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2240350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2240350

Contact Information

Bradley Pollina (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
110 West Third Street
New York, NY 10006
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 318
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 212,226
Footnotes:  217

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds