Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2241783
 
 

Footnotes (135)



 


 



Why Motives Matter: Reframing the Crowding Out Effect of Legal Incentives


Emad Hanzala Atiq


Yale University, Law School

March 30, 2013

123 Yale Law Journal 1070 (2013)

Abstract:     
Legal rules and regulations are routinely rationalized by appeal to the incentives they create. This Note examines an important but misunderstood fact about incentives — namely, that they often “crowd out” the natural motivations that citizens have to engage in socially valued behavior, such as a sense of civic duty, a commitment to personal growth, and charity towards others. The “crowding out effect” of incentives has traditionally been viewed as problematic because of cases where it renders incentives counter-productive — when fear of legal sanction or desire for financial reward substitutes for other forms of motivation in agents, this often leads to less of the socially valued behavior regulators sought to incentivize. In contrast, I explore whether the effect of legal incentives on our motivational psychology might be inherently regrettable in some cases, quite apart from the effect on behavioral outcomes. I show that a normative reframing of the crowding out effect that takes seriously the inherent value that resides in our “higher motives” generates novel insights into a variety of legal phenomena, including doctrinal rules in intellectual property, contracts, and torts; and a neglected theory for legal reformation, one that bears on the choice between rule- and standard-based legal directives and on the strategic use of the law to improve the way citizens conceptualize their obligations to each other.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Legal Incentives, Crowding Out Theory, Intrinsic Motivation, Patentable Subject Matter, Donative Promises, Heart Balm Laws, Rules and Standards

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 1, 2013 ; Last revised: December 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Atiq, Emad Hanzala, Why Motives Matter: Reframing the Crowding Out Effect of Legal Incentives (March 30, 2013). 123 Yale Law Journal 1070 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2241783

Contact Information

Emad Hanzala Atiq (Contact Author)
Yale University, Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 975
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 91,701
Footnotes:  135

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds