Psychologies of Property (and Why Property is Not a Hawk-Dove Game)
Carol M. Rose
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law
March 31, 2013
The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law, J. E. Penner and H. E. Smith, eds., Oxford University Press, 2013
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 13-20
This paper discusses the psychological states associated with various theories of property. Many theories view property from the psychological perspective of the owner, describing how property enables an owner to create or present a self to the world, to enjoy a zone of liberty, to acquire the confidence to participate in politics or economic activities, among other matters. This paper, however, takes particular interest in the psychological states associated with the non-owner — the person who confronts the property of others. Some theorists have described property as a “hawk/dove” or “chicken” game, in which the non-owner takes a dove role, implicitly from fear. This paper argues, however, that the non-owner’s respect for property cannot be explained adequately by fear. Respect for the property of others emerges as a somewhat mysterious psychological state from the point of view of rational actors, but it is nevertheless critical for supporting the institution of property.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: property, owners vs. nonowners, psychology of property, hawk-dove games, respect for rights
JEL Classification: K11, K1, K10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 2, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds