|
||||
|
||||
Warrants in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical EvidenceJohn S. HoweUniversity of Missouri at Columbia - Department of Finance Janice C. Y. HowQueensland University of Technology; Financial Research Network (FIRN) May 2000 Abstract: We investigate why firms include warrants in their initial public offerings (IPOs). We use a dataset of Australian IPOs to examine two hypotheses about the inclusion of warrants in an IPO. The agency-cost hypothesis emphasizes the need for sequential financing for relatively young firms, because sequential financing reduces the opportunities for managers to squander money on unprofitable projects. The signaling hypothesis focuses on the choice of securities as a signaling mechanism in a market characterized by information asymmetry. The evidence favors the signaling hypothesis, thus contributing to our understanding of the types of securities issued by firms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 41 working papers seriesDate posted: June 29, 2000Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.454 seconds