An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentarites on 'Does Consent Bias Research?'
Mark A. Rothstein
University of Louisville - Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy, and Law; University of Louisville - Louis D. Brandeis School of Law
Abigail B. Shoben
Ohio State University (OSU) - College of Medicine and Public Health
April 4, 2013
Am. J. Bioethics 13(4), W1-W3, 2013
The article is a response to the seven open peer commentaries submitted to our article "Does Consent Bias Research?" The response article discusses the following issues raised by the commentaries: (1) the definition of consent bias; (2) the magnitude of possible consent bias; (3) whether informed consent should be required for all information-based research; (4) alternative approaches to "traditional" informed consent; and (5) the value of "big data."
Number of Pages in PDF File: 4
Keywords: research ethics, informed consent, consent bias, selection bias
JEL Classification: K31, K32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 9, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.438 seconds