References (29)


Citations (1)


Footnotes (38)



Fixing the System: An Analysis of Alternative Proposals for the Reform of International Tax

Harry Grubert

U.S. Treasury Department; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)

Rosanne Altshuler

Rutgers University, New Brunswick/Piscataway, Faculty of Arts and Sciences-New Brunswick/Piscataway, Department of Economics

April 1, 2013

We evaluate proposals for the reform of the U.S. system of taxing cross-border income including dividend exemption, full current inclusion, a Japanese type version of dividend exemption with an effective tax rate test subject to an exception for an active business, dividend exemption combined with a minimum tax, and repeal of check-the-box. We consider two versions of dividend exemption with a minimum tax: one in which the minimum tax is imposed on a country by country basis and another in which the minimum tax is based on overall foreign income. In addition we evaluate versions of minimum taxes that allow current deductions for tangible investment against the minimum tax base.

To compare these schemes with current law, we reevaluate the efficiency cost of the dividend repatriation tax using evidence from the response to the 2005 repatriation tax holiday. We find that the burden of avoiding repatriations is higher than found in previous estimates, particularly for high tech profitable foreign businesses, and rises as deferrals accumulate. We simulate the effect of the various alternatives on effective tax rates for investment in high and low tax countries with inclusion of the importance of parent developed intangibles and their role in shifting income from the United States.

Our analysis demonstrates that it is possible to make improvements to the system across many dimensions including the lockout effect, income shifting, the choice of location and complexity. The goals are not necessarily in conflict. Compared to the other schemes, we find the per country minimum tax with expensing for real investment has many advantages with respect to these margins. The per country minimum tax offsets (at least in part) the increased incentives for income shifting under pure dividend exemption and is better than full inclusion in tailoring companies’ effective tax rates to their competitive position abroad. No U.S. tax burden will fall on companies that earn just a normal return abroad. The minimum tax is basically a tax on large excess returns in low tax locations, cases in which the company probably has less intense foreign competition. The investment will still be made. Unlike the Japanese type dividend exemption alternative considered, there is no cliff in which the income is subject to the full home country rate if it fails the minimum effective tax rate and active business test. Under the minimum tax with no cliff the company has more of an incentive to lower foreign taxes and will often prefer paying the U.S. minimum tax to paying a higher foreign tax. Finally, the minimum tax with expensing is more effective in discouraging income shifting than repeal of check-the-box. In summary, the per country minimum tax with expensing combines the advantages of the extreme alternatives, dividend exemption and full inclusion, and reduces their shortcomings.

Our comparison of the overall and per country minimum tax suggests that the overall version deserves serious consideration. While it is not as thorough as the per country minimum tax in targeting tax haven income, it is a substantial move in that direction and is much simpler.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 77

Keywords: International taxation, multinational corporations, territorial taxation, corporate taxation

JEL Classification: H20, H25, H87

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2013 ; Last revised: May 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Grubert, Harry and Altshuler, Rosanne, Fixing the System: An Analysis of Alternative Proposals for the Reform of International Tax (April 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245128 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2245128

Contact Information

Harry Grubert
U.S. Treasury Department ( email )
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220
United States
CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute)
Poschinger Str. 5
Munich, DE-81679

Rosanne Altshuler (Contact Author)
Rutgers University, New Brunswick/Piscataway, Faculty of Arts and Sciences-New Brunswick/Piscataway, Department of Economics ( email )
75 Hamilton Street
New Jersey Hall
New Brunswick, NJ 08901
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,249
Downloads: 767
Download Rank: 22,456
References:  29
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  38

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.297 seconds