Footnotes (164)



Merger Class Actions in Delaware and the Symptoms of Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation

Adam B. Badawi

Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

April 4, 2013

90 Washington University Law Review 965 (2013)

Recent research on corporate litigation has focused on three trends: the growth in percentage of mergers that result in litigation, the migration of cases away from Delaware, and the increasing prevalence of merger litigation occurring simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions. This Symposium Article uses a new and unique dataset of public company litigation to track how these trends have affected filings and litigation tactics in the Delaware Court of Chancery from 2004 to 2011. The data confirm that Delaware appears to have experienced a decline in filings during the early and middle periods of the sample, but the data also shows that there has been a sharp increase in the number of the number of acqusition-related cases filed in Delaware in 2010 and 2011.

The rise of concurrent, multi-jurisdictional litigation and the litigation tactics that it encourages are the likely reasons for the growth of acquisition-related cases in Delaware. While some plaintiffs’ attorneys may have left Delaware to escape the Chancery’s threats of lower attorneys’ fees and merit-based selection of lead counsel, in the current environment a Delaware filing may provide strategic advantages as foreign jurisdictions become saturated with filings. For example, lawyers may try to take control of a case by moving for expedited proceedings in Delaware or they may try to complicate negotiations over the selection of lead plaintiffs’ counsel. The threat of using these tactics may increase the possibility that a plaintiff will receive some share of a fee award either in Delaware or in a case being litigated elsewhere.

This article explores how the rules Delaware uses to manage deal cases may enable strategic behavior in the context of multi-jurisdictional litigation. This discussion provides reasons to believe that the use of tactics such as requesting expedited proceedings, contesting consolidation of cases, and involving out-of-state counsel earlier in proceedings should increase as multi-jurisdictional litigation increases. The empirical evidence provides substantial support for these theories. The article concludes with an assessment of how the observed increase in strategic tactics may affect debates over how and whether to respond to the rise of multi-jurisdictional litigation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Corporate Litigation, Merger Litigation, Delaware, Empirical Legal Studies

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2013 ; Last revised: February 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Badawi, Adam B., Merger Class Actions in Delaware and the Symptoms of Multi-Jurisdictional Litigation (April 4, 2013). 90 Washington University Law Review 965 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245250 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2245250

Contact Information

Adam B. Badawi (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 336
Downloads: 84
Download Rank: 204,283
Footnotes:  164

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds