Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245299
 
 

Footnotes (208)



 


 



Criminal Law - Merger of Sentences: The Legislature Says You Can't Hang 'Em Twice; Najera v. State, 214 P.3d 990 (Wyo. 2009)


Alexander K. Obrecht


University of Wyoming College of Law

November 4, 2011

Wyoming Law Review, 12 Wyo. L. Rev. 141 (2012)

Abstract:     
Historically, few constitutional protections conjured more mutated conceptions in society than double jeopardy. The United States Supreme Court holds that the Double Jeopardy Clause embodies the freedom from successive prosecution and multiple punishments for the same offense. This case note focuses on the freedom from multiple punishments, specifically post-conviction merger of sentences.

In Najera v. State, the jury convicted Najera of twelve counts of improper sexual contact with his two adopted minor daughters. Six counts were for sexual assault; the remaining six counts were for felony incest. The trial court sentenced Najera to consecutive sentences for sexual assault and incest. Najera appealed, contending that the convictions for sexual assault and incest should merge for sentencing purposes. The Wyoming Supreme Court agreed and reversed the trial court, holding that the convictions merged and that Najera should serve his sentences concurrently.

This case note advances three arguments to illustrate that the Wyoming Supreme Court must revisit the merger analysis applied in Najera. First, the court's application of the merger test parallels a test that the United States Supreme Court overruled. Second, the Wyoming Supreme Court based the policy justification and structure of its merger analysis on Pennsylvania law that as subsequently abandoned. Finally, the correct merger analysis represents a tool of statutory construction used to determine whether the legislature intended to create distinct offenses. The merger analysis applied in Najera must be revisited.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: double jeopardy, merger of sentences, Wyoming, Blockburger

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 5, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Obrecht, Alexander K., Criminal Law - Merger of Sentences: The Legislature Says You Can't Hang 'Em Twice; Najera v. State, 214 P.3d 990 (Wyo. 2009) (November 4, 2011). Wyoming Law Review, 12 Wyo. L. Rev. 141 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2245299

Contact Information

Alexander K. Obrecht (Contact Author)
University of Wyoming College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 3035
Laramie, WY 82071
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 223
Downloads: 21
Footnotes:  208

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds