Footnotes (162)



On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion

Andrew Tutt


April 6, 2013

30 Yale J. on Reg. 439 (2013)

This Note argues that judges should invalidate terms in contracts of adhesion that place the risk of loss on the costlier cost-avoider or that grant an option to one of the parties to impose non-reciprocal costs on the other. It goes on to justify this rule, arguing that it minimizes both the primary and secondary costs of contracts of adhesion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 8, 2013 ; Last revised: October 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Tutt, Andrew, On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion (April 6, 2013). 30 Yale J. on Reg. 439 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2246122

Contact Information

Andrew Tutt (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 741
Downloads: 153
Download Rank: 144,508
Footnotes:  162

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.188 seconds