On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion
April 6, 2013
30 Yale J. on Reg. 439 (2013)
This Note argues that judges should invalidate terms in contracts of adhesion that place the risk of loss on the costlier cost-avoider or that grant an option to one of the parties to impose non-reciprocal costs on the other. It goes on to justify this rule, arguing that it minimizes both the primary and secondary costs of contracts of adhesion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Date posted: April 8, 2013 ; Last revised: October 5, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.390 seconds