Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2247237
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (118)



 


 



Sexually Biased Case Law: A Biological Perspective


Erica Hei-Yuan Chan


Monash University

Hendrik Gommer


CIS Law

October 15, 2011

Chan, Erica Hei-Yuan and Gommer, Hendrik. Sexually biased case law: A biological perspective [online]. The Original Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2011, 155-171

Abstract:     
"Judges are not moral or intellectual giants, prophets, oracles, mouthpieces, or calculating machines. They are all-too-human workers," Richard Posner states in the introduction of How Judges Think (2009, p. 7). Yet all too often judges are put on a pedestal of rationality, and as a result, we lose the opportunity to discover and understand what human factors affect judicial decisions. Even if one accepts the positivist position and holds that the law is as it is written, distinct and separate from entities such as morality, the fact remains that the law is written, interpreted and applied by human hands and human minds very much affected by morals and emotions. The consequence is that judges and legislators, whether they know it or not, will draw upon their unconscious reservoirs of experience, social norms, morals, emotions and urges when making their decisions.

In this article we will examine how biological urges can be recognized in juridical verdicts. We hypothesize that biological mechanisms will become most clear in cases that concern reproduction and survival, as these are the ultimate aims of human genetics and it is likely that their importance will stimulate more emotional and unconscious reactions in the presiding judges, as well as more reliance on social norms that are predicated on biological mechanisms. We will therefore turn to an examination of the biological influences on judges and the law in two cases: R v Brown [1994] 1 AC 212 and R v The Queen (1981) 28 SASR 321. The first case concerns homosexuality and sadomasochism. The second case concerns a murder, which took place against the background of a history of serious domestic violence and sexual abuse. But first let us elaborate upon some aspects of biological law theory that are important to analyze these cases from a biological perspective.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: biological theory of law, evolutionary psychology, biased case law, moral, emotion, norms, reproduction, survival, judge, posner, sexual abuse, rationality, homosexuality, sadomasochism

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Chan, Erica Hei-Yuan and Gommer, Hendrik, Sexually Biased Case Law: A Biological Perspective (October 15, 2011). Chan, Erica Hei-Yuan and Gommer, Hendrik. Sexually biased case law: A biological perspective [online]. The Original Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2011, 155-171. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2247237

Contact Information

Erica Hei-Yuan Chan
Monash University ( email )
Wellington Road
Victoria, 3145
Australia
Hendrik Gommer (Contact Author)
CIS Law ( email )
De Bongerd 2A
Zuidhorn, Groningen 9801 AS
Netherlands
HOME PAGE: http://www.cislaw.eu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 293
Downloads: 38
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  118

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds