Abstract

 
 

References (31)



 
 

Citations (7)



 


 



The Small Sample Bias of the Gini Coefficient: Results and Implications for Empirical Research


George Deltas


University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics

January 2000

University of Illinois Working Paper No. 00-0103

Abstract:     
The Gini coefficient is a downwardly biased measure of inequality in small populations when income is generated by one of three common distributions. The paper discusses the sources of bias and argues that this property is far more general. This has implications for (i) the comparison of inequality among sub-samples, some of which may be small, and (ii) the use of the Gini in measuring firm size inequality in markets with a small number of firms. The small sample bias has often lead to mis-perceptions about trends in industry concentration. A small sample adjustment results in a reduced bias which can no longer be signed as positive or negative. Finally, an empirical example illustrates the importance of using the adjusted Gini. In this example it is shown that, controlling for market characteristics, larger shipping cartels include a stochastically identical (in terms of relative size) set of firms as smaller shipping cartels.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

JEL Classification: C19, L11, O14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Deltas, George, The Small Sample Bias of the Gini Coefficient: Results and Implications for Empirical Research (January 2000). University of Illinois Working Paper No. 00-0103. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=224896 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.224896

Contact Information

George Deltas (Contact Author)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics ( email )
1206 South Sixth Street
450 Commerce West
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
217-333-4586 (Phone)
217-244-6678 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,777
Downloads: 256
Download Rank: 57,591
References:  31
Citations:  7

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds