Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2249418
 


 



After the Choice: Challenging California's Physician-Only Abortion Restriction Under the State Constitution


Jennifer Dunn


University of California Hastings College of the Law

Lindsay Parham


University of California, Berkeley

2013

61 UCLA Law Review Discourse 22, 2013
UC Hastings Research Paper No. 31

Abstract:     
This article challenges the constitutionality of California’s physician-only abortion restriction under the state constitution and argues that the state has no compelling interest that justifies prohibiting qualified, licensed clinicians from providing first trimester aspiration abortions, by drawing on examples and studies from other states and the results of a major study from UCSF.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 12, 2013 ; Last revised: June 28, 2013

Suggested Citation

Dunn, Jennifer and Parham, Lindsay, After the Choice: Challenging California's Physician-Only Abortion Restriction Under the State Constitution (2013). 61 UCLA Law Review Discourse 22, 2013; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 31. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2249418

Contact Information

Jennifer Dunn (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Lindsay Parham
University of California, Berkeley
310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 319
Downloads: 45

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds