Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence
17 Pages Posted: 4 Jul 2004
Date Written: April 1979
Abstract
Optimization of the part of consumers is shown to imply that the marginal utility of consumption evolves according to a random walk with trend. To a reasonable approximation, consumption itself should evolve in the same way. In particular, no variable apart from current consumption should be of any value in predicting future consumption. This implication is tested with time-series data for the postwar United States. It is confirmed for real disposable income, which has no predictive power for consumption, but rejected for an index of stock prices. The paper concludes that the evidence supports a modified version of the life cycle-permanent income hypothesis.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis
-
The Family as an Incomplete Annuities Market
By Laurence J. Kotlikoff and Avia Spivak
-
The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital Accumulation
-
Consumption Growth Parallels Income Growth: Some New Evidence
-
The Importance of Gifts and Inheritances Among the Affluent
By Michael D. Hurd and Gabriela Mundaca
-
How Should We Think About Consumer Confidence?
By Stuart Berry and Melissa Davey
-
Can Currency Demand Be Stable Under a Financial Crisis? The Case of Mexico
By May Khamis and Alfredo Mario Leone
-
Israeli Attitudes About Inter Vivos Transfers
By Seymour Spilerman and Yuval Elmelech