Degradation Ceremonies and the Criminalization of Low-Income Women
University of California, Irvine - School of Law
April 19, 2013
3 U.C. Irvine Law Review, Vol. 3, No.2, 2013
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-42
This article, a call for both empirical social scientists and critical race theorists to engage with each other in careful interpretive analysis, applies sociologist Harold Garfinkel’s concept of ceremonial degradation to policies, practices, and proposals targeting low-income women of color in the United States. This article offers several examples of degradation ceremonies, including: excessive penalties and extrajudicial public shaming for women convicted of welfare fraud; mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients; high-publicity criminal prosecutions of mothers who violate school district residency requirements to enroll their children in more affluent schools; and tough criminal penalties for those who possess stolen infant formula or other necessities low-income Americans have difficulty obtaining. This article also describes some of the functions served by degradation ceremonies, including: the legitimation of material inequality, the perpetuation of social and economic myths, the policing of status quo distributions of property, and the satisfaction of the public’s emotional desire for sadomasochistic ritual. The article’s final section calls upon policy makers and scholars to acknowledge the degradation of low-income women that now occurs through policy and practice and offers broader suggestions for subverting the ceremonial degradation of the poor.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61
Keywords: Criminal law, Punishment, Shaming, Degradation ceremonies, Deniable degradation, Criminalization of poverty, Critical race theory, Poverty, Property poachers, Moral empathy, Inequality, Welfare, Drug testing, TANF, Welfare fraud, School district fraud, School residency, Shoplifting, Symbolic power
JEL Classification: D63, I3, J78, K14, K42, P16Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 20, 2013 ; Last revised: August 26, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds