Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2254136
 


 



Effective Plea Bargaining Counsel


Jenny Roberts


American University, Washington College of Law

April 19, 2013

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 100, 2013
American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2013-17

Abstract:     
Fifty years ago, Clarence Earl Gideon needed an effective trial attorney. The Supreme Court agreed with Gideon that the Sixth Amendment guaranteed him the right to counsel at trial. Recently, Galin Frye and Anthony Cooper also needed effective representation. These two men, unlike Gideon, wanted to plead guilty and thus needed effective plea bargaining counsel. However, their attorneys failed to represent them effectively, and the Supreme Court - recognizing the reality that ninety-five percent of all convictions follow guilty pleas and not trials - ruled in favor of Frye and Cooper.

If negotiation is a critical stage in a system that consists almost entirely of bargaining, is there a constitutional right to the effective assistance of plea bargaining counsel? If so, is it possible to define the contours of such a right? The concept of a right to an effective bargainer seems radical, yet obvious; fraught with difficulties, yet in urgent need of greater attention.

In this Essay, I argue that the Court’s broad statements in Missouri v. Frye, Lafler v. Cooper and its 2010 decision in Padilla v. Kentucky about the critical role defense counsel plays in plea negotiations strongly support a right to effective plea bargaining counsel. Any right to effective bargaining should be judged - as other ineffective assistance claims are judged - by counsel’s success or failure in following prevailing professional norms. The essay discusses the numerous professional standards that support the notion that defense counsel should act effectively when the prosecution seeks to negotiate and should initiate negotiations when the prosecution fails to do so, if it serves the client’s goals.

The objections to constitutional regulation of plea bargaining include the claims that negotiation is a nuanced art conducted behind closed doors that is difficult to capture in standards and that regulating bargaining will open floodgates to future litigation. While real, these are manageable challenges that do not outweigh the need to give meaning to the constitutional right to effective counsel. After all, in a criminal justice system that is largely composed of plea bargains, what is effective assistance of counsel if it does not encompass effectiveness within the plea negotiation process?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Plea Bargaining, right to counsel, Sixth Amendment, Gideon, Frye, Lafler

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 20, 2013 ; Last revised: August 7, 2013

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Jenny, Effective Plea Bargaining Counsel (April 19, 2013). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 100, 2013; American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2013-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2254136

Contact Information

Jenny Roberts (Contact Author)
American University, Washington College of Law ( email )
Washington, DC
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,290
Downloads: 286
Download Rank: 61,899

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.562 seconds