Hope a Better Rate for Me
James Ming Chen
Michigan State University - College of Law
Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 17, 2000
Ratemaking, the dreariest legal expression of the dismal science, is sexy again. Once upon a time, judicially enforced constitutional restraints on the setting of public utility rates strengthened the intellectual backbone of the Lochner era. Contemporary interest in this doctrine stems from the imposition of "the duty to interconnect, to lease unbundled network elements, and to sell services for resale" on incumbent firms in the few remaining "market segments that have natural monopoly characteristics." The Federal Communications Commission's contribution to this great legal transformation, its embattled total element long-run incremental cost rule (TELRIC), will in all likelihood be reviewed under some variant of the confiscatory ratemaking doctrine. So controversial is TELRIC that it has inspired a literature on "deregulatory takings" and a counter-literature denying the entire phenomenon.
On this occasion, I do not wish so much to re-engage this debate as to entertain the combatants. I therefore offer the following anthem for our deregulatory age, a ballad "dedicated to the [law] I love." Sing along, all you who debate the notion of deregulatory takings, "And we'll have memories for company / Long after the songs are sung."
Number of Pages in PDF File: 2Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 23, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds