What Consensus? Ideology, Politics and Elections Still Matter
Steven C. Salop
Georgetown University Law Center
April 23, 2013
Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-007
This article, which was prepared for an ABA Antitrust Section Panel, discusses the role of ideology and politics in antitrust enforcement and the impact of elections in the last twenty year on enforcement and policy at the federal antitrust agencies. The article explains the differences in antitrust ideologies and their impact on policy preferences. The article then uses a database of civil non-merger complaints by the DOJ and FTC over the last three Presidential administrations to analyze changes in the number, type and other characteristics of antitrust enforcement. It also discusses change in vertical merger enforcement and other antirust policies such as amicus briefs, reports and guidelines. The article concludes that elections do matter and that the impact of elections on the DOJ and FTC has differed significantly.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: antitrust laws, antitrust enforcement, politics, elections
JEL Classification: K00, K30, K39working papers series
Date posted: April 24, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds