Law, Morality and Social Discourse: Jury Nullification in a Canadian Context

Melanie Janelle Murchison

Queen's University Belfast - School of Law

August 1, 2012

In the thirty years since the inception of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms there have been three cases of attempted jury nullification, resulting in varies degrees of success. This thesis will provide an overview of the process jury nullification as well as a discussion on the current Canadian jurisprudence, including all three cases (R. v. Morgentaler, R. v. Latimer and R. v. Krieger). This analysis will be undertaken using two competing theoretical viewpoints: those of neo-natural law theorist Ronald Dworkin and social theorists Alan Hunt and Michel Foucault. Ultimately this thesis will conclude that while it is beneficial to approach the phenomenon of jury nullification using Dworkin’s theory of “law as integrity”, it alone cannot sufficiently explain the process and it is through using both natural law and social theory that jury nullification can be best understood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 89

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Murchison, Melanie Janelle, Law, Morality and Social Discourse: Jury Nullification in a Canadian Context (August 1, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2256008 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2256008

Contact Information

Melanie Janelle Murchison (Contact Author)
Queen's University Belfast - School of Law ( email )
School of Law
Belfast BT7 1NN, BT7 1NN
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 226
Downloads: 39

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.406 seconds