Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2256508
 


 



Judging and Conciliation – Differentiations and Complementarities


Peter Collin


Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for European Legal History

January 16, 2013

Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series No. 2013-04

Abstract:     
Diverse forms of conflict resolution were established throughout the course of history: state and non-state, judicial and extra judicial, consensual, authoritarian, contradictory forms, etc. This contribution ties in with a German tradition of discussions which broaches the issue of the alternatives of conflict resolution under the phrase “Richten oder Schlichten (Judging or conciliation). The paper sketches the life path of this discussion and develops some tentative considerations on how semantic confrontations of “Richten” and “Schlichten” can be made palatable in order to develop research questions and analytical patterns from a historical as well as a current-day perspective.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: dispute resolution, courts, non-state justice, civil procedure, legal history

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Collin, Peter, Judging and Conciliation – Differentiations and Complementarities (January 16, 2013). Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Research Paper Series No. 2013-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2256508 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2256508

Contact Information

Peter Collin (Contact Author)
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of the Sciences - Max Planck Institute for European Legal History ( email )
Hansaallee 41
Frankfurt am Main, 60323
Germany
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 191
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 223,663

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.234 seconds