Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257357
 


 



The Paradoxes of Restitution


Mark A. Edwards


William Mitchell College of Law

April 27, 2013

116 West Virginia Law Review 619 (2013)

Abstract:     
Restitution following mass dispossession is often considered both ideal and impossible. Why? This article identifies two previously unnamed paradoxes that undermine the possibility of restitution.

First, both dispossession and restitution depend on the social construction of rights-worthiness. Over time, people once considered unworthy of property rights ‘become’ worthy of them. However, time also corrodes the practicality and moral weight of restitution claims. By the time the dispossessed ‘become’ worthy of property rights, restitution claims are no longer practically or morally viable. This is the time-unworthiness paradox.

Second, restitution claims are undermined by the concept of collective responsibility. People are sometimes dispossessed because collective responsibility is unjustly imposed on them for wrongs committed by a few members of a group. But restitution may require the dispossession of innocent current occupiers of land – thus imposing a type of collective responsibility on them. Therefore, restitution can be seen as committing the very wrong it purports to right. This is the collective responsibility paradox.

Both paradoxes can be overcome, but only if we recognize the rights-worthiness of others before time fatally corrodes the viability of restitution. We must also draw a careful distinction between the imposition of collective rights-unworthiness, which results in the mass dispossession of others, and the voluntary acceptance of collective responsibility, which results in the restitution of others.

After developing these ideas, the article examines them in the context of a particularly difficult and intractable case of dispossession and restitution. It draws upon interviews with restitution claimants whose stories reveal the paradoxes of restitution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 28, 2013 ; Last revised: June 1, 2014

Suggested Citation

Edwards, Mark A., The Paradoxes of Restitution (April 27, 2013). 116 West Virginia Law Review 619 (2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2257357

Contact Information

Mark A. Edwards (Contact Author)
William Mitchell College of Law ( email )
875 Summit Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55115
United States
651.290.6441 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 179
Downloads: 22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds