Judging the Case Against Same-Sex Marriage
Northwestern University School of Law
April 25, 2013
University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 13-08
The case for same-sex marriage has been politically triumphant, and its victory looks inevitable. It nonetheless is curiously incomplete. It has succeeded, not because the most sophisticated opposing arguments have been considered and rejected, but because those arguments have not even been understood. Those arguments rest on complex claims, either about what sustains the stability of heterosexual marriages or about what those marriages essentially are. The most familiar claim, that recognition of same-sex marriage jeopardizes the heterosexual family, demands an account of the transformation of family norms in the past half century. Major social change should not be undertaken without a full awareness of what is at stake.
This essay remedies a major gap in the literature. It critically surveys and evaluates the arguments against same-sex marriage. You may not be persuaded by them. In fact, you shouldn’t be persuaded by them. But you need to know what they are.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74
Keywords: same-sex marriage, gay rights, Amy Wax, Robert George
JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 28, 2013 ; Last revised: May 9, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds