Federal Public Defense in an Age of Inquisition

David Patton

Federal Defenders of New York

April 24, 2013

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, p. 100, 2013

This Essay asks whether federal criminal defendants receive fairer process today than they did in 1963, when Gideon v. Wainwright was decided. It concludes that in many situations they do not; indeed, they often receive far worse. Although Gideon and the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 undoubtedly improved the quality and availability of counsel in the federal courts, extraordinary damage has been done since then to the aspect of the criminal justice system that makes lawyers so valuable: the adversary process. Sentencing severity, the control of that severity by prosecutors rather than judges or juries, and high rates of pretrial detention have greatly limited defendants’ ability to challenge the government’s version of the facts and the law. This Essay briefly describes federal criminal practice as it existed in 1963 and illustrates the shifts that have occurred by discussing current practice in the federal public defender office in New York City.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: criminal law, public defense, federal sentencing, federal criminal law, sentencing, criminal process, Gideon

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 2, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Patton, David, Federal Public Defense in an Age of Inquisition (April 24, 2013). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, p. 100, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2259109

Contact Information

David Patton (Contact Author)
Federal Defenders of New York ( email )
One Pierrepont Plaza, 16th Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,534
Downloads: 266
Download Rank: 78,766

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.797 seconds