Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2259757
 


 



The Second Amendment and Militia Rights: Distinguishing Standard Model Legal Theory from the Historical Record


Patrick J. Charles


Government of the United States of America - Air Force

May 2, 2013

40 Fordham Urban Law Journal City Square 1

Abstract:     
In this Journal’s symposium edition Gun Control and the Second Amendment, Nicholas J. Johnson argues the Standard Model Second Amendment is the correct interpretation in both law and history. In particular, Johnson chastizes any historically based militia interpretation as “nonsense” because it conflates rights with duties. And frustrated with different militia focused interpretations of the Second Amendment, he queries: “How many tries are allowed before the enterprise loses credibility?” To those historians that have waded through the evidentiary record, the irony of Johnson’s view that scholarship should not improve and evolve in response to new research and on-going scholarly debate will not go unnoticed. Johnnson shares with other supporters of the self-styled Standard Model a preference for ideology over evidence. The Standard Model “right to shoot, to train, or to gather for shooting practice or other activity with their individual arms that approximates or facilitates the militia duty” is not the Founders’ right, but closer in spirit to Daniel Shays, not James Madison.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Second Amendment, militia rights, originalism, legal history, legal theory, well regulated militia, bear arms

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2013 ; Last revised: September 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Charles, Patrick J., The Second Amendment and Militia Rights: Distinguishing Standard Model Legal Theory from the Historical Record (May 2, 2013). 40 Fordham Urban Law Journal City Square 1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2259757

Contact Information

Patrick J. Charles (Contact Author)
Government of the United States of America - Air Force ( email )
Washington, DC
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 194
Downloads: 48

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.359 seconds