International Criminal Law: An Ideology Critique

Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 26(3), 2013

47 Pages Posted: 6 May 2013

See all articles by Tor Krever

Tor Krever

London School of Economics - Law School

Date Written: May 6, 2013

Abstract

The article engages in an ideology critique of international criminal law texts and discourse, drawing on a theoretical framework developed by critical legal studies scholars in order to interrogate, in a different jurisprudential context, the assumptions undergirding contemporary international criminal law (ICL) scholarship. It argues that the triumphalism surrounding ICL and its adequacy to deal with conflict and violence ignores the factors and forces — including specific international legal interventions in countries’ political-economies — that shape or even help establish the environment from which such conflict and violence emanates. In uncritically celebrating ICL and equating it with a pacific international rule of law, ICL scholarship risks shaping passive acquiescence in the status quo and discouraging more through-going efforts to address the systemic forces underlying instances of violence, including political-economic forces shaped by international legal institutions.

Keywords: international criminal law, international tribunals, criminal justice, ideology, rule of law, international law, criminal law

JEL Classification: K14, K33, K42

Suggested Citation

Krever, Tor, International Criminal Law: An Ideology Critique (May 6, 2013). Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 26(3), 2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2261148

Tor Krever (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law School ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
474
Abstract Views
2,147
Rank
110,401
PlumX Metrics