Can an Arbitrator Conduct Independent Legal Research? If Not, Why Not?
Paul Bennett Marrow
New York Law School
May 6, 2013
Do arbitrators have authority to undertake independent legal research without authorization by the parties? Or, are they prohibited from doing so, as many arbitrators believe? These are vexing questions. For answers, this article looks for guidance in the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), state arbitration statutes, case law, and the rules of several arbitration institutions, as well as the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes. The takeaway is that if an arbitrator wants an award that will withstand an attack based on "evident partiality," "misconduct" or the "exceeding of powers," there are good reasons to refrain from unauthorized legal research. This may seem counter intuitive. Arbitration is a creature of contract and the implications that flow from that conclusion heavily impact the answers to the questions being proposed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 8
Keywords: independent legal research, arbitrator misconduct, arbitrators evident pariality, arbitrators exceeding of powers, arbitrator ethics
JEL Classification: K12, K20, K33, K39, K41, K49working papers series
Date posted: May 7, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds