Global Tangles: Law, Headcoverings and Religious Identity
Whittier Law School
December 31, 2012
Santa Clara Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
This paper argues that international human rights law is inadequate in understanding the complexities of Muslim women’s headcoverings and that it has failed to protect Muslim women from prohibitive and punitive measures of the liberal State. Through a review of the relevant cases from the European Court of Human Rights as well as a review of prohibitive laws from Muslim-majority Turkey, the paper argues that international human rights law is prejudiced to say the least, and, heeding Janet Halley’s advice, needs to take a break from feminism in order to fully protect Muslim women’s dignity as defined by Muslim women themselves.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: Hijab, international human rights, Islam, gender, law and religion, comparative law, Turkey, European Court of Human RightsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 7, 2013 ; Last revised: July 16, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.797 seconds