Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2261341
 


 



Insurrections and the Cooptation of Human Rights Language


Seval Yildirim


Whittier Law School

2012

UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
In this essay, I argue that the current international human rights discourse is by its nature an exclusionary and selective one. By privileging certain types of human rights over others, current international human rights law alleviates state responsibility to ensure human dignity at the most basic levels, such as adequate and meaningful access to food, water and shelter for all. Moreover, human rights rhetoric has been corrupted, coopted and poisoned by its utilization to justify neo-imperialist projects that use military force to ensure easy access to Middle Eastern natural resources, specifically oil and water. Current rhetoric of human rights is simply inadequate to address the realities on the ground, as it focuses on a specific set of rights, while rendering other fundamental points of human dignity as of secondary or of no importance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: international human rights, Middle East, uprisings, revolution

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Yildirim, Seval, Insurrections and the Cooptation of Human Rights Language (2012). UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2261341

Contact Information

Seval Yildirim (Contact Author)
Whittier Law School ( email )
3333 Harbor Blvd.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 270
Downloads: 21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.469 seconds