Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2261877
 


 



Monitoring, Reporting, and Recalling Defective Financial Products


Daniel Schwarcz


University of Minnesota Law School

May 7, 2013

University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2013
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper 13-26

Abstract:     
In recent years, innovations in consumer financial protection have drawn heavily from the law governing the safety of tangible products. This short essay, prepared for a symposium entitled "Frontiers of Consumer Protection," extends this approach by evaluating whether the law governing post-sale product safety for tangible consumer products offers potential lessons for consumer financial protection. In particular, it considers the extent to which the law could require providers of consumer financial products to affirmatively monitor, report or correct regulatory problems with their products that come to light after sale. Such post-sale self-policing by financial firms could offer benefits similar to those that justify standard product recall law: the sellers of financial products may be best situated to identify unintended negative consequences of their products that come to light after sale and to minimize the resulting costs through proactive market interventions. The essay illustrates this approach by reconsidering the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rules implementing the Dodd-Frank Act’s “ability to repay” requirement for mortgages. It also suggests that the analytical frame embedded in post-sale safety requirements offers potential lessons for a number of other consumer financial protection issues, such as disclosure requirements and prohibitions on impermissible discrimination.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Product Recall, Ability to Repay, Suitability, Consumer Protection, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 8, 2013 ; Last revised: July 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Daniel, Monitoring, Reporting, and Recalling Defective Financial Products (May 7, 2013). University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2013; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper 13-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2261877

Contact Information

Daniel B. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 596
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 169,699

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds