Happiness Institutions

Jennifer Nou

University of Chicago - Law School

May 7, 2013

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 8, 2013

Subjective well-being, or happiness, measures will not reside in sterile vacuums but rather will thrive within policymaking institutions. This Commentary argues that such measures necessarily implicate issues of deep disagreement that must be resolved by legitimate actors and procedures. Given the current lack of methodological consensus, individual agencies should thus experiment with happiness measures in discrete rulemakings when the available well-being data are robust and could usefully supplement a rule’s cost-benefit analysis. This Commentary was written for Duke Law Journal’s annual administrative law symposium on “A Happiness Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis”.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: subjective well-being, happiness, cost-benefit analysis, welfare, social cost of carbon

JEL Classification: I30, K20, K23

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Nou, Jennifer, Happiness Institutions (May 7, 2013). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 8, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2262058

Contact Information

Jennifer Nou (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 534
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 174,444

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.562 seconds