Structural Corporate Degradation Due to Too-Big-To-Fail Finance
Mark J. Roe
Harvard Law School
April 9, 2014
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Forthcoming
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Law Working Paper No. 253/2014
Corporate governance incentives at too-big-to-fail financial firms deserve systematic examination. For industrial conglomerates that have grown too large to be efficient, internal and external corporate structural pressures push to resize the firm. External activists press the firm to restructure to raise its stock market value. Inside the firm, boards and managers see that the too-big firm can be more efficient and more profitable if restructured via spin-offs and sales. But a major corrective for industrial firm overexpansion fails to constrain large, too-big-to-fail financial firms when (1) the funding boost that the firm captures by being too-big-to-fail sufficiently lowers the firm’s financing costs, and (2) a resized firm or the spun-off entities would lose that funding benefit. Propositions (1) and (2) have both been true and, consequently, a major retardant to industrial firm overexpansion has gone missing for large financial firms. The effect resembles that of a corporate poison pill, but one that disrupts the actions of both outsiders and insiders.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 48
Keywords: financial crisis, too-big-to-fail, corporate governance, bank regulation, bank capital, international finance
JEL Classification: E44, G18, G21, G28, G33, G34, G38, K22, L25Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 10, 2013 ; Last revised: May 15, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.407 seconds