Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2263141
 


 



Battered Women and the Requirement of Imminence in Self-Defence


Samantha Goosen


University of KwaZulu-Natal

April 23, 2013

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2013

Abstract:     
Should the South African courts abolish the traditional imminence standard, something must be used to stand in its place. The identification of the various alternatives which have been suggested to replace imminence - most notably the establishment of the "reasonable woman standard" as advanced in the case of S v Engelbrecht 2005 (92) SACR 41 (W) - has moved the law of self-defence into the realm of subjectivity. The end result not only undermines self-defence as a justification defence, but is also unworkable for a number of reasons. For instance, utilising expert testimony to explain how the battered woman’s syndrome affects individual perception would leave a judge with no meaningful way to determine if that abused woman’s belief in the imminence of danger was reasonable, even if viewed from her distorted perspective. It is suggested that no reference need be made to the "reasonable battered woman", since South African courts already do this to a limited extent by taking a number of factors into account in determining if the abused woman acted reasonably. By rethinking certain factors in the situation as a set of relatively innocuous normative propositions, the abused woman’s actions can be judged in accordance with standard propositions in the law of self-defence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Imminence and battered women, abused women, necessity and abused women, self-defence, self-defence and abused women, defences for abused women, battered woman syndrome and imminence, immediately necessary, right to life, putative defence, cycle of violence, proportionality self-defence justification

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 11, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Goosen, Samantha, Battered Women and the Requirement of Imminence in Self-Defence (April 23, 2013). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2263141

Contact Information

Samantha Goosen (Contact Author)
University of KwaZulu-Natal ( email )
Umbilo Road
Durban, KZN 4000
South Africa
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 129
Downloads: 9

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds