Pure Patriarchy: Nineteenth-Century Canadian Marriage
Constance B. Backhouse
University of Ottawa - Common Law Section
McGill Law Journal, Vol. 31, 1986, 264-312
The author provides a detailed account of nineteenth-century Canadian views of marriage and divorce. In the first part of the article, the author discusses the conceptions of, and attitudes towards, marriage and how they differed in rhetoric and reality. In the second part, the author examines the legislative and judicial responses to marital breakdown. Through extensive reference to nineteenth-century statutes and case law, the author reveals that whereas the legislatures were prepared to adopt a “companionate model” of marriage (ie: equality between the spouses), the judiciary adhered to a “patriarchal model” which vested authority in the marriage in the husband. In the result, marriage was not the uniquely moral institution claimed by nineteenth-century rhetoric; rather, it served to bolster male supremacy in Canada.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: 1800s, nineteenth, 19th, century, history, historical, marriage, divorce, Canada, Canadian, family law, marital, breakdown, companionate model, patriarchal, patriarchy, husband, wife, rhetoric, equality, spousesAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 11, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.531 seconds