Updating Beliefs with Ambiguous Evidence: Implications for Polarization
Roland G. Fryer Jr.
Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); American Bar Foundation; University of Chicago
Harvard University - Department of Economics
Matthew O. Jackson
Stanford University - Department of Economics; Santa Fe Institute; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
July 1, 2013
We introduce and analyze a model in which agents observe sequences of signals about the state of the world, some of which are ambiguous and open to interpretation. Instead of using Bayes' rule on the whole sequence, our decision makers use Bayes' rule in an iterative way: first to interpret each signal and then to form a posterior on the whole sequence of interpreted signals. This technique is computationally efficient, but loses some information since only the interpretation of the signals is retained and not the full signal. We show that such rules are optimal if agents sufficiently discount the future; while if they are very patient then a time-varying random interpretation rule becomes optimal. One of our main contributions is showing that the model provides a formal foundation for why agents who observe exactly the same stream of information can end up becoming increasingly polarized in their posteriors.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: beliefs, polarization, learning, updating, Bayesian updating, biases, discrimination, decision making
JEL Classification: D10, D80, J15, J71, I30working papers series
Date posted: June 5, 2013 ; Last revised: July 27, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds