The Challenge of the Bad Man

Michael Plaxton

University of Saskatchewan - College of Law

May 19, 2013

McGill Law Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, 451

H.L.A. Hart’s insight, that some people may be guided by an offence provision because they take it as authoritative and not merely to avoid sanctions, has had an enormous influence upon criminal law theory. Hart, however, did not claim that any person in any actual legal order in fact thinks like the “puzzled man”, and there is lingering doubt as to the extent to which we should place him at the center of our analysis as we try to make sense of moral problems in the criminal law. Instead, we might find that our understanding of at least some issues in criminal law theory is advanced when we look through the eyes of Holmes’ “bad man”. This becomes clear when we consider the respective works by Hart and Douglas Husak on overcriminalization, James Chalmers and Fiona Leverick’s recent discussion of fair labeling, and Meir Dan-Cohen’s classic analysis of acoustic separation. These works also suggest, in different ways, that an emphasis on the bad man can expose the role of discretion in criminal justice systems, and the rule of law problems it generates.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: Hart, normativity, Holmes, overcriminalization, fair labeling, criminal law

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 20, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Plaxton, Michael, The Challenge of the Bad Man (May 19, 2013). McGill Law Journal, Vol. 58, No. 2, 451. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2267200

Contact Information

Michael Plaxton (Contact Author)
University of Saskatchewan - College of Law ( email )
Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 402
Downloads: 94
Download Rank: 190,111

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds