Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2267320
 


 



Unpopular Constitutionalism


Mila Versteeg


University of Virginia School of Law

January 11, 2013

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 89, 2014, Forthcoming
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2013-17

Abstract:     
Constitutions are commonly thought to express nations’ highest values. They are near-universally proclaimed in the name of “We the People” and regarded — by scholars and the general public alike — as an expression of the people’s views and values. This Article shows empirically that this widely held image of constitutions does not correspond with the reality of constitution-making around the world. The Article contrasts the constitutional-rights choices of ninety countries between 1981 and 2010 with data from nearly one-half million survey responses on cultural, religious, and social values conducted over the same period. It finds, surprisingly, that in this period, the link between nations’ specific constitutional choices and their citizens’ values has generally been weak or non-existent. The Article presents additional evidence from an original survey that reveals that, overwhelmingly, people want to enshrine their values in their constitution. Together, these findings suggest that the world’s constitutions are not meaningfully supported by the people they represent, and that the global practice of constitution-making can be characterized as an exercise in “unpopular constitutionalism.”

The Article attributes this finding to a dilemma that lies at the heart of constitutional design. When constitutions serve as unique and defining statements of national ideals and popular values, they may flout universal human rights norms or well-established principles of constitutional design. On the other hand, when constitutional rules merely reflect sound constitutional design and universal right norms, they may be remote from the people’s values and traditions and therefore fail in practice. The findings suggest that constitution-makers have largely resolved this dilemma in favor of universal rights and ready-made constitutional models, which explains the disconnect from popular values.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: constitutions, constitutionalism, popular opinion, constitutional theory, empirical legal studies

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 20, 2013 ; Last revised: March 6, 2014

Suggested Citation

Versteeg, Mila, Unpopular Constitutionalism (January 11, 2013). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 89, 2014, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2013-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2267320

Contact Information

Mila Versteeg (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,106
Downloads: 464
Download Rank: 33,479

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds