Charitable Giving, Tax Expenditures, and Direct Spending in the United States and the European Union
Lilian V. Faulhaber
Boston University - School of Law
Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 39, No. 87-129, 2014
Boston Univ. School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-17
Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-17
This Article compares the ways in which the United States and the European Union limit the ability of state-level entities to subsidize their own residents, whether through direct subsidies or through tax expenditures. It uses four recent charitable giving cases decided by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to illustrate the ECJ’s evolving tax expenditure jurisprudence and argues that, while this jurisprudence may suggest a new and promising model for fiscal federalism, it may also have negative social policy implications. It also points out that the court analyzes direct spending and tax expenditures under different rubrics despite their economic equivalence and does not provide a clear rule for distinguishing between the two, adding to the confusion of Member States and taxpayers. The Article then surveys the Supreme Court’s Dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence, under which the Court analyzes discriminatory state spending provisions. The Article concludes that although both the Supreme Court and the ECJ prioritize formalism over economic equivalence, the Supreme Court’s approach to tax expenditures is more defensible than that of the ECJ due to the different federal structures of the two jurisdictions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: tax, international tax, international law, European Union law, public policy, non-profit law, legislation, fiscal federalism, charitable organizations
JEL Classification: H2, H23, H29, K33, K34
Date posted: May 22, 2013 ; Last revised: September 18, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.860 seconds