References (35)


Citations (1)



Taxes and Mistakes: What's in a Sufficient Statistic?

Daniel H. Reck

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Economics

February 1, 2014

What determines the efficiency cost of taxation in the presence of optimization errors? Employing recent results quantifying efficiency cost when consumers are subject to biases, this paper shows how budget adjustment rules, debiasing, and the source of bias affect efficiency cost. Budget adjustment rules govern how taxpayers meet their budget constraint in spite of misperceptions. Complete consideration of budget adjustment rules shows why simply detecting misperception of taxes is insufficient for welfare. An application to “ironing” — the confusion of average and marginal tax rates — leads to a clarification of prior welfare analysis of ironing. Finally, if consumers “debias” at sufficiently high stakes, policymakers’ attempts to exploit biases to reduce inefficiency — like switching from high- to low-salience taxes — can actually increase inefficiency. Any cognitive costs of debiasing exacerbate this “curse of debiasing.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: behavioral tax, tax salience, applied theory, excess burden

JEL Classification: H210, H310, D110

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 23, 2013 ; Last revised: February 2, 2014

Suggested Citation

Reck, Daniel H., Taxes and Mistakes: What's in a Sufficient Statistic? (February 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2268617 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2268617

Contact Information

Daniel H. Reck (Contact Author)
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Economics ( email )
611 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1220
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 819
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 137,149
References:  35
Citations:  1

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds