Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2271274
 


 



Standing Room Only: Why Fourth Amendment Exclusion and Standing Can No Longer Logically Coexist


Sherry F. Colb


Cornell University - Law School

2007

28 Cardozo Law Review 1663 (2007)

Abstract:     
Standing Room Only: Why Fourth Amendment Exclusion and Standing Can No Longer Logically Coexist argues that the Fourth Amendment standing doctrine is fundamentally incompatible with the existing Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. Fourth Amendment standing provides that only a person who has suffered an invasion of her own normatively reasonable expectations of privacy, given the facts about her situation that police may not even know (including whether she owns the property searched), may suppress evidence that police turned up through a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Meanwhile, the existing exclusionary rule doctrine maintains that the sole objective of Fourth Amendment suppression is to motivate police officers, given facts available to them (such as whether they have probable cause), to conform their conduct to the law prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures. This Article proposes that by taking into account the actual facts about the defendant’s situation in assessing her standing to bring a suppression motion, it is arbitrary to consider the fact that she did (or did not) have an ownership right in the property where the search occurred, while simultaneously ignoring the fact that she was engaged in criminal activity within that property. This Article accordingly concludes that the ex ante perspective involved in determining whether the police have misbehaved (and thus need to be deterred through exclusion), is logically at odds with the ex post perspective involved in assessing whether the person seeking suppression was in fact entitled to remain free of the search that uncovered evidence against her. The Article takes a close look at the case of Minnesota v. Carter as a perfect illustration of this doctrinal incoherence.

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 29, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Colb, Sherry F., Standing Room Only: Why Fourth Amendment Exclusion and Standing Can No Longer Logically Coexist (2007). 28 Cardozo Law Review 1663 (2007). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2271274

Contact Information

Sherry F. Colb (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 232
Downloads: 14

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds