Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2271359
 


 



In Quest of the Arbitration Trifecta, or Closed Door Litigation?: The Delaware Arbitration Program


Thomas Stipanowich


Pepperdine University School of Law

2013

Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, Forthcoming
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/10

Abstract:     
The Delaware Arbitration Program established a procedure by which businesses can agree to have their disputes heard in an arbitration proceeding before a sitting judge of the state’s highly regarded Chancery Court. The Program arguably offers a veritable trifecta of procedural advantages for commercial parties, including expert adjudication, efficient case management and short cycle time and, above all, a proceeding cloaked in secrecy. It also may enhance the reputation of Delaware as the forum of choice for businesses. But the Program’s ambitious intermingling of public and private forums brings into play the longstanding tug-of-war between the traditional view of court litigation as a public venue for private dispute resolution and the and perception of courts as institutions that represent and are accountable to the public. A constitutional challenge based on third parties’ right of access to court proceedings resulted in a district court ruling that arbitration proceedings heard before sitting judges of the Delaware Chancery Court were “essentially” non-jury civil trials and thus were subject to public access. The case raises legitimate questions about the appropriateness of structuring a program in which sitting judges serve as arbitrators and preside over a procedure that is effectively shielded from public view. It also implicates issues regarding the use of public resources in ostensibly private disputes, and even the way our justice system is funded. This article explores the factors that provided the impetus for the Delaware Arbitration Program and analyzes the arguments and policy considerations for and against the district court’s decision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Arbitration, litigation, trial, confidentiality, privacy, Constitution, public access, right of access, First Amendment, Delaware Chancery Court, Delaware Arbitration Program, nonbinding arbitration, ADR, court-connected ADR, contracts, commercial law, corporate law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 29, 2013 ; Last revised: December 13, 2013

Suggested Citation

Stipanowich, Thomas, In Quest of the Arbitration Trifecta, or Closed Door Litigation?: The Delaware Arbitration Program (2013). Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law, Forthcoming; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013/10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2271359

Contact Information

Thomas Stipanowich (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
310-506-4655 (Phone)
310-506-4437 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 659
Downloads: 144
Download Rank: 119,011

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.672 seconds