Regulating Ex Post: How Law Can Address the Inevitability of Financial Failure
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Steven L. Schwarcz
Duke University School of Law
November 18, 2013
92 Texas Law Review 75 (2013)
UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 13-07
Unlike many other areas of regulation, financial regulation operates in the context of a complex interdependent system. The interconnections among firms, markets, and legal rules have implications for financial regulatory policy, especially the choice between ex ante regulation aimed at preventing financial failure and ex post regulation aimed at responding to that failure. Regulatory theory has paid relatively little attention to this distinction. Were regulation to consist solely of duty-imposing norms, such neglect might be defensible. In the context of a system, however, regulation can also take the form of interventions aimed at mitigating the potentially systemic consequences of a financial failure. We show that this dual role of financial regulation implies that ex ante regulation and ex post regulation should be balanced in setting financial regulatory policy, and we offer guidelines for achieving that balance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: financial regulation, systemic risk, ex ante regulation, ex post regulation, Dodd Frank
Date posted: May 30, 2013 ; Last revised: December 28, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds