On Minimizing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Economics
Brown University - Department of Economics
London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
January 6, 2014
Mimeo, (2013), Brown University
Estimation of empirical relationships is prone to bias. Economists have carefully identified and addressed sources of bias in structural and quasi-experimental approaches, but the randomized control trial (RCT) has only recently begun to receive such scrutiny. In this paper, we argue that several lessons from medicine, derived from analysis of thousands of RCTs conducted over the past 60 years and establishing a clear link between certain practices and biased effect estimates, can be used to reduce the risk of bias in economics RCTs. We first identify the subset of these lessons applicable to RCTs in economics. We then use them to assess the risk of bias in estimates from economics RCTs published between 2001 and 2011. Most studies fail to report important details on study design necessary to assess risk of bias. Many report practices known to bias effect estimates. We conclude with suggestions on how to remedy these issues.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: randomized controlled trials, field experiments, bias, treatment effect estimates
JEL Classification: C9, C90, C93, C10, C12, C18
Date posted: May 31, 2013 ; Last revised: July 13, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.297 seconds