Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2272173
 


 



Brief of Software Innovators, Start-Ups, and Investors as Amici Curiae in Oracle v. Google


Jennifer M. Urban


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

May 30, 2013


Abstract:     
How Limitations on Copyright in Computer Programs Are Critical to Software Innovation and Investment.

This case raises critical questions about how far copyright extends into the basic communication tools -- Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) -- that are presently ubiquitous in the Web environment and software development generally. APIs establish basic interoperability between systems, between applications and systems, and between applications themselves.

This kind of interoperability between programs and systems is foundational to software innovation, as well as to computer systems and ecosystems themselves. Because of this, how copyright's default rules affect interoperability is central to how innovation happens on the ground. These rules have been stable for many years. Baker v. Selden, which was decided in 1879, established that copyright law extends only to creative expression and not to ideas; section 102(b) of the 1976 Copyright Act makes clear that copyright does not cover methods of operation, procedures, processes, or systems; and courts, especially in the Ninth Circuit, have explained how these concepts apply directly to interoperability needs.

In the case, Oracle is arguing that high-level aspects of the Java APIs are copyrightable, and so that Google has infringed its copyrights in the Java APIs by using some of them to create a Java implementation for Android. The district court ruled that the elements of the Java APIs at issue are not copyrightable, and that Google had therefore not infringed. The Federal Circuit is now reviewing the case on appeal.

In this amicus brief, a wide range of start-up companies, their investors, and innovators, including those who were involved in the similar Lotus v. Borland case thirty years ago, ask the court to consider the impact changing copyright boundaries would have on innovation and investment. It explains how innovators rely on APIs, and how limitations on copyright undergird innovation and competition in the software and Internet spaces. The brief argues that the district court's ruling was correct, and urges the court to preserve the longstanding limitations on copyright in computer programs. It explains that doing otherwise harm what is presently a vital and robust industry, chilling both innovation and the investment that supports it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: copyright, intellectual property, software, innovation, investment, investors, start-ups, open source, open standards, oracle, google

JEL Classification: K00

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Urban, Jennifer M., Brief of Software Innovators, Start-Ups, and Investors as Amici Curiae in Oracle v. Google (May 30, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2272173 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272173

Contact Information

Jennifer M. Urban (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
(510) 642-7338 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.samuelsonclinic.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,723
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 118,380
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.360 seconds