The Future of Marijuana in the United States

Steven B. Duke

Yale Law School

April 19, 2013

Oregon Law Review, Vol. 91, 2013
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 299

There are striking similarities in the failed movement to repeal marijuana prohibition in the 1970s and the efforts underway today. A major difference is that the merits of repeal are far clearer today than they were forty years ago. This article discusses some of the reasons why marijuana prohibition cannot be justified, including the myriad ways in which marijuana prohibition encourages serious crime against victims having no connection to marijuana. It explains the limited long-term value of decriminalization versus regulated legalization, which should be the ultimate objective of reformers. Possible treaty constraints on federal reforms are explored. The limitations and uncertainties inherent in the incompatibility of state-level permissiveness and federal prohibition are also addressed. Reformers are advised to intensify their efforts to replace prohibition with regulation at both state and federal levels.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 31, 2013 ; Last revised: September 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Duke, Steven B., The Future of Marijuana in the United States (April 19, 2013). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 91, 2013; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 299. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2272232

Contact Information

Steven B. Duke (Contact Author)
Yale Law School ( email )
127 Wall St.
New Haven, CT 06511
United States
203-4324959 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,669
Downloads: 906
Download Rank: 17,607

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds